Hide
Show all
Email this article The role of the morphologic categorization of p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual stained cytology in detecting of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+).
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze the morphological characteristics of p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual stained cells (DS) in cytology, to expand understanding of potential diagnostic value of integration of biomarkers in cytology and contribute to the existing knowledge on their utility in cervical cancer screening.
Materials and Methods: In our study included a total 162 woman, who had previous abnormal Pap screening results and were enrolled in an opportunistic screening program. For these participants 162 pap /p16INK4a/Ki-67 co- tests results and 29 histopathology results were available.
Results: In our study, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of p16INK4a/Ki-67 DS of cervical smear, with abnormal morphology of stained cells to detect histologic high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) were 91%, 94%, 93%, 94% and 93%, respectively(
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Reference
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
T. C. Wright, B. M. Ronnett, R. J. Kurman. Precancerous lesions of the cervix. Robert. In: Robert J. Kurman, ed. Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 7th ed. Springer; 2019:240-303.
Koss LG. Dysplasia. A real concept or a misnomer? Obstet Gynecol. 1978;51(3):374-379.
Richart RM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathol Annu. 1973;8:301-328.
del Pino, Garcia. Value of p16 INKA4a as a marker of progression?regresion in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1. AM J Obstet Genecol. Published online 2009.
Karsa L von, Arbyn M, Vuyst HD, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Summary of the supplements on HPV screening and vaccination. Papillomavirus Res. 2015;1:22-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2015.06.006
Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR, et al. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(5):321-346. doi:10.3322/caac.21628
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention USA. Genital HPV Infection—CDC Fact Sheet.; 2004.
Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):890-907. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0
Koutsky, PhD L. Epidemiology of Genital Human Papillomavirus Infection. Am J Med. 1997;102(5):3-8. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00177-0
Depuydt CE, Jonckheere J, Berth M, Salembier GM, Vereecken AJ, Bogers JJ. Serial type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) load measurement allows differentiation between regressing cervical lesions and serial virion productive transient infections. Cancer Med. 2015;4(8):1294-1302. doi:10.1002/cam4.473
Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337(sep18 1):a1284-a1284. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284
Sadler L. Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Risk of Preterm Delivery. JAMA. 2004;291(17):2100. doi:10.1001/jama.291.17.2100
Samson SLA, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):325-332. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000151991.09124.bb
Habbema D, Weinmann S, Arbyn M, et al. Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: Harms of cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(5):1215-1222. doi:10.1002/ijc.30524
Petry KU, Schmidt D, Scherbring S, et al. Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(3):505-509. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.033
Fujii T, Saito M, Hasegawa T, et al. Performance of p16INK4a/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry for identifying CIN2+ in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion specimens: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20(1):134-142. doi:10.1007/s10147-014-0688-0
Possati-Resende JC, Fregnani JHTG, Kerr LM, Mauad EC, Longatto-Filho A, Scapulatempo-Neto C. The Accuracy of p16/Ki-67 and HPV Test in the Detection of CIN2/3 in Women Diagnosed with ASC-US or LSIL. Grce M, ed. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0134445. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134445
საშვილოსნოს ყელის კიბოს სკრინინგი და დიაგნოსტიკა - გაიდლაინი.pdf.
Kakaliashvili-Dzagnidze S, Khardzeishvili O, Tabagari S. Diagnostic Accuracy of p16INK4a/Ki-67 Dual Immunostaining for Detection of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women Involved in Cervical Cancer Screening in Georgia. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2023;2023:7988323. Published 2023 Jun 5.doi:10.1155/2023/7988323
Schmidt D, Bergeron C, Denton KJ, Ridder R, for the European CINtec Cytology Study Group. p16/ki-67 dual-stain cytology in the triage of ASCUS and LSIL Papanicolaou cytology: Results from the European Equivocal or Mildly Abnormal Papanicolaou Cytology Study. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011;119(3):158-166. doi:10.1002/cncy.20140
Elena Allia, Guglielmo Ronco. Interpretation of p16(INK4a) /Ki-67 dual immunostaining for the triage of human papillomavirus-positive women by experts and nonexperts in cervical cytology. Cancer Cytopathol . 2015;123. doi:1002/cncy.21511
Kloboves Prevodnik, V., Jerman, T., Nolde, N., Repše Fokter, A., Jezeršek, S., Pohar Marinšek, Ž., Klopčič, U., Hutter Čelik, S., Gornik Kramberger, K., Primic Žakelj, M., & Ivanuš, U. Interobserver variability and accuracy of p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining on conventional cervical smears. Diagn Pathol. Diagnostic pathology,. Published online May 2019. doi:doi:10.1186/s13000-019-0821-5
Nkwabong E, Laure Bessi Badjan I, Sando Z. Pap smear accuracy for the diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions. Trop Doct. 2019;49(1):34-39. doi:10.1177/0049475518798532
Edelman M, Fox AS, Alderman EM, et al. Cervical Papanicolaou smear abnormalities in inner city Bronx adolescents: prevalence, progression, and immune modifiers. Cancer. 1999;87(4):184-189.
Eversole GM, Moriarty AT, Schwartz MR, et al. Practices of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology, 2006. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(3):331-335. doi:10.5858/134.3.331
Ouh YT, Park JJ, Kang M, et al. Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040). J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(24):e164. doi:10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e164
Machalek, D. A, Poynten, I. M. A Composite Cytology-Histology Endpoint Allows a More Accurate Estimate of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Prevalence.
Diya Das Moumita Sengupta, Moumita Sengupta, Keya Basu. Role of p16/Ki-67 Dual Immunostaining in Detection of Cervical Cancer Precursors. Journal of cytology. 2018;35. doi:doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_4_17
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 2346-8491 (online)