Microbiome Composition of the Sulcus Gingiva in Healthy Periodontium: Evidence from 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Studies
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The human oral cavity harbors one of the most diverse microbial communities in the body, with the gingival sulcus representing a specialized ecological niche adjacent to the gingival margin and tooth surface. In health, this sulcus supports a complex but balanced microbiota that contributes to immune homeostasis and prevents pathogen overgrowth. Traditional culture‑based methods were limited in detecting the full breadth of microbial diversity, often overlooking fastidious and uncultivable taxa. The advent of 16S rRNA gene sequencing has revolutionized oral microbiome research by enabling high‑resolution, culture‑independent profiling of bacterial communities. This approach has improved our understanding of microbial ecology in the periodontal sulcus, particularly in distinguishing health‑associated taxa from those related to periodontal disease.
Aim: This article aims to synthesize current evidence from 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies on the composition of the gingival sulcus microbiome in clinically healthy individuals, highlighting dominant bacterial taxa and community structure associated with health.
Methods: A review of peer‑reviewed studies was conducted, focusing on 16S rRNA gene sequencing analyses of subgingival plaque or sulcus samples from periodontally healthy subjects. Eligible studies employed next‑generation sequencing platforms (e.g., Illumina MiSeq, 454‑pyrosequencing) and standard bioinformatics pipelines for taxonomic classification against reference databases such as HOMD (Human Oral Microbiome Database) and Green genes. Key metrics included alpha diversity (richness and evenness), beta diversity (community differences), and relative abundances of taxa at phylum, genus, and species levels.
Results: Across multiple 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies, the gingival sulcus microbiome in healthy individuals is characterized by high diversity and the predominance of several bacterial phyla:
- Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, and Spirochaetes are consistently detected as dominant phyla in healthy sulcus communities.
- At the genus level, Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Corynebacterium, Veillonella, Neisseria, Haemophilus, and Capnocytophaga are frequently abundant in health, reflecting a community engaged in saccharolytic and homeostatic functions.
- Health‑associated taxa tend to show higher relative abundance and prevalence compared to disease‑associated pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola, which are rare or absent in healthy sulci.
- Alpha diversity measures in healthy subjects are generally higher than in individuals with periodontitis, suggesting that microbial richness and evenness may be protective against dysbiosis.
- Beta diversity analyses demonstrate distinct clustering of microbiome profiles between healthy and diseased groups, indicating that community structure shifts markedly with inflammation and periodontal breakdown.
Conclusions: Evidence from 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies has significantly advanced our understanding of the gingival sulcus microbiome in health. A diverse and balanced community dominated by specific Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria taxa appears characteristic of periodontal health. These communities differ markedly from those found in periodontal disease, supporting the concept that microbial community composition and diversity contribute to periodontal homeostasis. Future research integrating metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and host immune profiling will further clarify microbial functions critical for maintaining gingival health. Continued longitudinal studies are needed to define health‑associated microbiome signatures that may inform preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abellan-Schneyder I, Matchado MS, Reitmeier S, Sommer A, Sewald Z, Baumbach J, et al. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. mSphere. 2021 Feb 24;6(1). doi:10.1128/mSphere.01202-20 PubMed PMID: 33627512.
Aja-Macaya P, Conde-Pérez K, Trigo-Tasende N, Buetas E, Nasser-Ali M, Nión P, et al. Nanopore full length 16S rRNA gene sequencing increases species resolution in bacterial biomarker discovery. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):26486. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-10999-8
Ashton JJ, Beattie RM, Ennis S, Cleary DW. Analysis and Interpretation of the Human Microbiome. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Jul;22(7):1713–22. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000809 PubMed PMID: 27243592.
Banerjee S, Schlaeppi K, van der Heijden MGA. Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Sep;16(9):567–76. doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1 PubMed PMID: 29789680.
Bharti R, Grimm DG. Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2021 Jan 18;22(1):178–93. doi:10.1093/bib/bbz155 PubMed PMID: 31848574.
G AS, A ML, Vanja KC, F PM. Divergence and Redundancy of 16S rRNA Sequences in Genomes with Multiple rrn Operons. J Bacteriol. 2004 May 1;186(9):2629–35. doi:10.1128/jb.186.9.2629-2635.2004
Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Campbell JH, Firestone ND, Kumar PS, Yang ZK, et al. Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. ISME J. 2012 Jun 1;6(6):1176–85. doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.191
Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Firestone ND, Gross EL, DiFranco JM, Hardman JH, et al. CORE: A Phylogenetically-Curated 16S rDNA Database of the Core Oral Microbiome. PLoS One [Internet]. 2011 Apr 22;6(4):e19051-. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019051
Kim BR, Shin J, Guevarra RB, Lee JH, Kim DW, Seol KH, et al. Deciphering Diversity Indices for a Better Understanding of Microbial Communities. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017/12/28. 2017 Dec;27(12):2089–93. doi:10.4014/jmb.1709.09027
Kim DM, Hong I, Lee JY, Im S, Paeng KW, Jung UW, et al. Comparison of microbiome profiles across sample types in patients with peri-implantitis using 16S rRNA sequencing. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2026 Dec 2. doi:10.5051/jpis.2501680084 PubMed PMID: 41667138.
Liu H, Chen J, Chen Q, Zhang L, Feng Y, Wu B, et al. Comparative analysis of the microbiota in gingival crevicular fluid from peri-implantitis and periodontitis using 16 S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Dec 26;26(1):175. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-07572-0 PubMed PMID: 41449378.
Rajasekaran JJ, Krishnamurthy HK, Bosco J, Jayaraman V, Krishna K, Wang T, et al. Oral Microbiome: A Review of Its Impact on Oral and Systemic Health. Microorganisms. 2024 Aug 29;12(9). doi:10.3390/microorganisms12091797 PubMed PMID: 39338471.
Wen CC, Lin JCY, Salamanca E, Teng NC, Lin YJ, Wu YF, et al. Full-length 16S rRNA sequencing reveals microbial characteristics in supragingival plaque of periodontitis patients. J Dent Sci. 2025 Jul;20(3):1739–48. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2025.03.040 PubMed PMID: 40654456.
Zamparini F, Buonavoglia A, Pellegrini F, Diakoudi G, Pavoni M, Fiorini G, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Tongue and Periodontal Pocket Microbiome in Relation to Helicobacter pylori Gastric Disease: 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;14(8). doi:10.3390/antibiotics14080804 PubMed PMID: 40867998.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 2346-8491 (online)